Honor Board cases, spring term 2012
Each term, the Honor Board secretary issues a report to The Knox Student detailing cases heard during the past 10 weeks. Names of complainants and respondents have been redacted to protect confidentiality. Full redacted reports on cases are available to members of the Knox community in the Office of the Associate Dean of the College. A verdict of “no decision” means that the Board could not reach a consensus on guilt; thus, no penalty was assigned and no further action was taken.
Case 13
Number of respondents: 1
Charge: Submitting work from a previous course without prior
permission of the professor
Plea: Not guilty
Verdict: Guilty
Penalty: F in the course
Result of appeal: Penalty upheld
Case 14
Number of respondents: 2
Charge: Inappropriate collaboration on work
Plea: Not guilty (both respondents)
Verdict: Guilty (both respondents)
Penalty: F in the course (both respondents)
Case 15
Number of respondents: 2
Charge: Cheating
Plea: Not guilty (both respondents)
Verdict: Guilty; no decision
Penalty: F in the course; no decision
Case 16
Number of respondents: 1
Charge: Plagiarism
Plea: Not guilty
Verdict: Guilty
Penalty: F in the course and mandatory academic leave until fall term
Result of appeal: Penalty upheld
Case 17
Number of respondents: 1
Charge: Plagiarism
Plea: Not guilty
Verdict: No decision
Case 18
Number of respondents: 1
Charge: Plagiarism
Plea: No plea
Verdict: Guilty
Penalty: F in the course
TKS editors reserve the right to remove any comments that are off-topic or contain hate speech or personal attacks.
